|
300
Mar 11, 2007 22:26:06 GMT -5
Post by Big on Mar 11, 2007 22:26:06 GMT -5
Notice American population just turned 300 million. I bet the author kept that in mind as well.
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 22:43:58 GMT -5
Post by JensenS on Mar 11, 2007 22:43:58 GMT -5
There are some people who interpret the US as the invaders and Iraqis as the 300 defending their homeland. I was assuming someone who saw the movie would take this stance, but you guys took it in a different direction. I was kind of interested to see if anyone would take this position as well. However I'm not particularly surprised that none did. Big, the author penned the COMIC BOOK in 1998, what was America's population then? And irregardless, the number 300 wasn't an arbitrary decision, its historical fact. Dumbass.
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 22:48:54 GMT -5
Post by satiev1 on Mar 11, 2007 22:48:54 GMT -5
I think what Big meant to say was that the author waited till the U.S. population turned 300 million to release the movie to match the 300 which was a historical number.
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 22:51:55 GMT -5
Post by JensenS on Mar 11, 2007 22:51:55 GMT -5
If this is the position that you two tards are attempting to now take I'm truly speechless. I've seriously got nothing, you two have put up some dumb posts, and espoused some pretty dumb theories, but this very well may top all of them.
But just for my further amusement, read ground's post on the bottom of the last page, what say you to that?
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 22:56:53 GMT -5
Post by Big on Mar 11, 2007 22:56:53 GMT -5
I say nothing. To turn the issue that way is going against all the facts.
The Evangelicals are simply not that smart nor motivated to interpret the issue the other way.
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 22:58:48 GMT -5
Post by Big on Mar 11, 2007 22:58:48 GMT -5
I would go as far as saying Iran are the Persians and Israel is the Democracy defended by 300 million Americans.
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 23:00:36 GMT -5
Post by JensenS on Mar 11, 2007 23:00:36 GMT -5
So according to you, the release of this movie, at this time, with this title is part of a massive conspiracy set to foster anti-Iranian sentiment for an upcoming war masterminded by Frank Miller, Zach Snyder, and George W. Bush.
Do I have this right, I just want to make sure, I wouldn't want to accuse you of anything that isn't true.
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 23:04:26 GMT -5
Post by Big on Mar 11, 2007 23:04:26 GMT -5
I wouldn't get that dramatic. I simply think the directors wanted to make money and Americans are willing to pay good money for a movie like that at this time.
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 23:05:20 GMT -5
Post by yazdani on Mar 11, 2007 23:05:20 GMT -5
Oh, you still are. Snyder's quote says it all, he's not trying to drum up support for a war against Iran, like you, satiev, yazdani and any others have maintained. when did i say that?
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 23:06:45 GMT -5
Post by JensenS on Mar 11, 2007 23:06:45 GMT -5
Big, I'm disappointed. Had you agreed with that statement I'd have been able to comfort myself with the assumption that you don't actually believe what you're writing and are in fact just messing with me, and a few others. But, that wasn't to be. You really are that stupid, and that ignorant.
|
|
|
300
Mar 11, 2007 23:09:56 GMT -5
Post by Big on Mar 11, 2007 23:09:56 GMT -5
I might be stupid but your sig on the bottom of your posts is something else!
|
|
|
300
Mar 12, 2007 0:48:45 GMT -5
Post by satiev1 on Mar 12, 2007 0:48:45 GMT -5
Jensen, why is hard to believe that the director could have released the movie at a time when tension between Iran and U.S. are high? The reason like Big said is not to create animosity towards persians, but to make more money. Do you honestly believe that the director did not have this in mind? Because directors never wanna profit off political and current events right.
|
|
Mike
AA
Wrestling With The Devil
Posts: 660
|
300
Mar 12, 2007 7:42:49 GMT -5
Post by Mike on Mar 12, 2007 7:42:49 GMT -5
Jensen, why is hard to believe that the director could have released the movie at a time when tension between Iran and U.S. are high? The reason like Big said is not to create animosity towards persians, but to make more money. Do you honestly believe that the director did not have this in mind? Because directors never wanna profit off political and current events right. As a movie guy I can answer this, maybe because the release date, and anticipated release date for movies occur about 3 years prior to release. I didn't like the movie, but rest assured, with Jensen I agree on this, I can't recall a crazier point of argument, ever, regarding a movie and the "political" concepts or belief in propoganda. Rest assured, just as mentioned in an article I did awhile back, The Inconvenient Truth About 24, there is an orchestrated liberal attack on this movie by certain liberal factions to help politicize one of their views.
|
|
|
300
Mar 12, 2007 14:03:13 GMT -5
Post by Big on Mar 12, 2007 14:03:13 GMT -5
Mike,
3 years ago it was clear that tensions with Iran will be high for a while and that American population would hit 300 million around this time.
|
|
|
300
Mar 12, 2007 14:22:35 GMT -5
Post by Flop the Nuts on Mar 12, 2007 14:22:35 GMT -5
Big, you have to be dicking with everyone, right? A certain amount of trolling is ok, but you're really off the charts if you truly believe this.
I'm starting to agree with Donkey that this board isn't as fun as it used to be. I like to "debate" with people who are on the opposite end of the political spectrum, but you and Satiev just tend to blame America first, and believe every sort of possible conspiracy. You guys absolutely cannot be convinced of anything counter to your already held beliefs, no matter what the stats say. Maybe SGallan and others had the right idea when they decided not to spend time on the "Politics" boards.
|
|