|
|
Post by ugly on Aug 16, 2006 8:35:37 GMT -5
Should the UFC spread the fights out more. I like the monthly title fights but would it be better if the UFC had a PPV event every 3-4 months and have like a supercard?
|
|
|
|
Post by ground3pound on Aug 16, 2006 9:16:40 GMT -5
If I ran the UFC, I'd target the WWE crowd.
It wasn't that long ago that RAW was beating Monday Night Football in the ratings.
Anyone who is willing to watch fake combat will surely watch the real thing.
So, I would run a weekly show. Off course there wouldn't be weekly title fights. Those could be on PPV. Just the WWE used to do.
|
|
eazee
Round of 12
Posts: 351
|
Post by eazee on Aug 17, 2006 13:40:01 GMT -5
I like ground3pound's idea of a weekly show. I don't like the idea of 1 supercard every 3-4 months. You wouldn't get to see some of the young up and comers like you do now, the one card would be filled with the big names (although that may not be a bad thing for some...)
|
|
|
|
Post by ugly on Aug 17, 2006 22:23:05 GMT -5
Id still like to see the up and comers in possibly a weekly show but the last couple of ppv have been a dissapointment.
|
|
oc
Round of 12
Posts: 294
|
Post by oc on Aug 18, 2006 9:53:50 GMT -5
Ugly. The talent pool isn't deep enough yet to have lots of fights, I think they have the Fight Nite close to the PPV to generate heat for the PPV. You're spot on though about UFC challenging the WWE/NFL, the younger generation knows MMA just like it knows B ball and the NFL. My son and his buddies are all joing a club in our area.
|
|
